Chilvary over Salary!

My friend sent this article to me and it made me mad and proud.

I am mad because 22% of Americans polled said he was wrong! Okay, idiots: If he didn't do anything and his wife got hurt; 93% would scream about his lack protection for his wife. IDIOTS!

I am proud because 150% got off his tail and defended the woman of his dreams! Well done Antonio Davis! Keep doing it because you show America what a real man is like. I am also proud of the 78% of Americans who agreed with his actions. It shows that we're not completely sold out to the leftist mentality that is eroding away at the conscience of America. Maybe Antonio (great name; it's my son's middle name), you have shown other guys what they need to do.....

The Backbone of the U.S.A.

I should be sleeping because I have a lot of programming to do tomorrow, but this couldn't wait!

honor - a showing of usually merited respect Webster's Online Dictionary
commitment - the state or an instance of being obligated or emotionally impelled Webster's Online Dictionary

I daily grow weary of the radical socialists in this country that demean the excellent work of our military. Men and women who courageously afford me the opportunity to rant in the quietness of my humble (and I mean that) abode. When the day comes that the draft will be necessary; I will enlist not only because of my love of country but my love for the soldiers out there who don't deserve today's draftees to come along side them. They need the Silent Americans whose family knows that when the moment comes; family becomes second to God and nation. I look forward to that day so I can say to those serving, "Thanks, we'll take over from here. Great job! Keep us in your prayers."

Why 'honor' & 'commitment'? I couldn't think of two (2) better words to describe the faithfulness of our brethren fighting the fight the wackos will never do. To be berated on a constant basis by turncoats dumbdamentalists like John F. Kerry, who called them terrorists (and I have it recorded as I watched that crap before going to church!). Honor is the force the flows through the veins and lungs in every soldier despite the a@#holes (pardon mon francais) here who cannot spend useful time praying for our troops. Commitment is the workhorse that pumps the heart and lungs when exhausted from endless nights and coming to grips with the reality that they may not make it home one last time. They do it because they realize the reality of the blessing it is to be an American and they want others to enjoy that right. Some are in for the money (maybe all), but I thank you for not complaining about doing your job and getting it done!

AAAAAaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggggggghhhhhh!!!!!

Sorry, but Bush needs to sign into law that any further anti-war crap should be constituted as treason. Harry Bellafonte needs dynamite shoved up his end and blown into the Bermuda Triangle where his brain and crouage is (or is that in the land of OZ?). I don't know if there are enough voices out there saying thanks, but know this troops: "I love you and thank you very much!"

Dead Beat Parents Escape Judgment

I must say that this is a shame that parents aren't being sued instead in the linked article. For crying out loud; let's blame the tv show and cheetos because they were sooo good. If we continue down this route; then I am suing the sun because it darkened me. I am suing my car because it adds three (3) ounces to my butt because it gets me where I need to. I am going to sue Jay because I am hooked writing blogs instead of finishing my book projects.

Anyone know anything else to sue on????

Regal Racist

Sorry I have been away for a bit. I got this from Jay. He understated my bp rising on this. For crying out loud, who's next? Saddam Hussein? Osama Bin Laden? Ted Kennedy?

This is a sad commentary on B.E.T. (Booty Everywhere Television). It shows that they, like the dummakrats, are not in tune with the positive "blacks" in the country because I would have picked Condi Rice, Bill Cosby, Denzel Washington or even Oprah before Louis FarHatred! But then again, I am not running the show. If I were, there would be more class to that channel rather than the ghetto-crap they put forward on a daily basis.

"Hey, Black America! Wanna get the ''Man'' off of you? The tell the BruthaMan to stop selling you short on B.E.T.!"

IT'S FINALLY HERE!

I just wanted to celebrate today because my permit finally showed up today! YES!
oorah!

Free music at what cost?

I write this blog unfortunately because there seems to be an overwhelmingly foolish populace out there who shouldn't own computers. I have a friend who has been arguing with me over the legality of downloaded music from LimeWire.

I asked him, "Did you pay for any of the music"?
His response, "No! But, how do you know that LimeWire doesn't have a deal to allow the music to be shared?"
I followed, "Have you paid anything to LimeWire?"
His response, "No! Leave me alone!" and he hung up.
Later in an email he added, "Ever borrowed an album from a buddie who loaned it to you so that you could dubb it? I don't dub to sell this music. I see limewire as a buddie with lots of albums and he's loaning them to me. Why do they made stereos with recording capability??"

While the question would seem logical, I responded but I'll save you that diatribe. I'd like to hear yours.

Now, some of you out there are illegally copying music, software and many other things. I have done my share of copying to which I have made restitution and have been paying for the products I own. But, are things really free? I have repaired several machines that were hacked, and infected with viruses and spyware; all because the user needed to have Kazaa or Limewire running on their machine. My services now come with a charge! Some of you can be so wise as to have a firewall. Yet, it does squat when the file sharing program installs a hole in your firewall in order for it to work. Plus, how much data and information is being collected from your system unwillingly? Oh, yeah, I used to program my machines to crash and deteriorate all data when accessed illegally because I had the code memorized. Too much code now to memorize so I have at least three (3) levels of firewall technology running on my systems.

What about Blogspot.com? Yes, it's free (thank God!), yet at what price? How much data is gathered from just one of our sites? Isn't funny to know that we who wish to protect or civil liberties are allowing agencies like the NSA, BATFE, FBI & such to compile several profile schemes based off of our personalities? We're making the jobs for the criminal profilers all the easier. If you have nothing to hide, there's nothing to worry about. What about signing up for free email or online dating services (they work!)? You are putting out there information for even hackers to enjoy because you answered those "harmless" demographic questions. Secret questions for many of these sites are strikingly similar to what would be required of your financial institutions. How strange???? People still put their social security number or birthdate information in their stinking userids, email addresses, password and wonder why people seem to "know" them. HELLO RETARD! YOU TOLD THEM EVERYTHING THEY WANTED TO KNOW!

I'm sorry for the outburst. Just working in computers for over 15 years, I have seen some retarded things like people pasting their passwords on the monitor for the world to see. I am one of the most anal people you will meet when it comes to security. I am probably more anal than the NSA. But, that's just me.

So, in conclusion. Before you eagerly accept the next new thing: Go to Condition Orange (see Boston's Gun Bible 4/8) and check your rear; no matter who it's from; even me!

Is Procreation a viable option for evolutionists?

Thanks robosquirrel, you are the man! I pulled this from his article on Knowledge. It is his third view of his philosophy.

Man—every man—is an end in himself, not the means to the ends of others. He must exist for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself. The pursuit of his own rational self-interest and of his own happiness is the highest moral purpose of his life.

Before I rant, let me respond with wisdom beyond my intellect:
Love is patient, love is kind and is not jealous; love does not brag and is not arrogant, does not act unbecomingly; it does not seek its own, is not provoked, does not take into account a wrong suffered, does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth; bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Corinthians 1 3:4-7

Okay, now. If he is a parent, then I couldn't be his kid because I'd be in a world of hurt not receiving attention because my dad's ideology does not permit him to acknowledge my existence. If I am a sick or needy individual I would fret often because I would be a liability to him and therefore expendable. If I am a criminal then I can have a field day with him because his ideology forces him to operate alone and one target is better to stop than two (unless you have the magic bullet).

There is that proverb, that "no man is an island, but to be a man; one must stand alone". Profound in that, yes, loved ones in a time of war can be liabilities, however, loved ones are who God created as a blessings to us. This view seems fatalistic. Sad, too. Yet, it makes him who he his and someone who needs an eHug.

I ask you all to eHug robosquirrel for me. Thanx!

Fable or Fact

Thank you again robosquirrel for your excellent comments that warrant only a responsible response, which I pray shall follow.

One can believe that Adam and Eve were the first humans and sculpted out of mud by God, but the only evidence we have of that is a book written by people and translated and reinterpreted and edited by people over the course of well over thousands of years. Does that make it fact? Some say yes; that's their opinion. I think that's a pretty shaky foundation for understanding the way the world works.

"translated and reinterpreted" (tarred): When you make comments like this, you actually insult the scientific community. The scientific community translates and reinterprets data on a continual basis. But, the Bibles we carry now are translations of the original writings that are in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek. Mind you, there are some Bible versions which are 'tarred' because the author of the Bible version came with presuppositions that contradict the very nature of the Bible (which can be discussed in another forum). However, you stand partially correct in you statement about its origin. It was co-written. Authored by God and written by man using his own personality.

"Does that make it fact?": How could it not? A book written over a period of 1500 years, without contradiction from not all scholars but an array of different personalities and mindsets. A book that has more ancient copies in existence than any other work of antiquity. The Bible (5000+), Homer's Illiad (500-600). Homer's Illiad is the only work that comes closest to the number of supporting manuscripts and it is touted as an authentic work, yet it pales in comparison to the Bible which offers over ten times as much supporting evidence and it is touted as fraudulent, or allegorical. Back to your statement though: Isn't the fact that all the writings we have come closest to the actual events occurring and also the fact that there are more copies (25K+) of fragments of passage with supporting evidence a scientific breakthrough? Science revels over supporting evidence and what is offered by the Bible is overwhelmingly scientifically proven and substantiated evidence. What reason could scientists not agree with this save they're negligence to embrace the super-natural (oops, I mean metaphysical)?

"that's their opinion. I think that's a pretty shaky foundation for understanding the way the world works.": You have your opinion and I can respect that. But, I believe that it is the one that's shaky when we need to address the workings of the world. Yet, forgive me, you did not explain it to me, so then I cannot really say it's shaky if it doesn't exist.

Epistomology and Origins

Educated Shoprat had an excellent post regarding the Ultimate Question of God's existence, intelligent design, etc. In my ranting opportunities, fate brought it that robosquirrel and I have entered into an interesting dialogue. Maybe I read him wrong (please tell me as you review Shoprat's blog). I'll post his response and go from there:

OK, maybe I wasn't clear. I don't know about "The Agnostic View", but I don't pretend to have some some kind of superiority over those who believe in God (or don't - I accept that anything's possible but that don't think there is a way to prove it). What I didn't say in so many words is that my view is that knowledge can not be absolute. I don't KNOW that we can never know, how could I? How do you know God is eternal, all-knowing and all-powerful? That is certainly belief, but belief and fact are no more mutually exclusive than they are mutually inclusive. Perhaps.
Perhaps, when we die and go to heaven, we are suddenly instilled with the Ultimate Answer and everything makes sense. Even if we were able to determine scientifically how life began and the world was formed, we probably wouldn't really know whether we'd actually figured it out or not.
This is going to be a never-ending philosophical circle. I don't know that you can't know, but you don't know that I don't know that you can't know, and so on. What I mean is that there is a limit to human understanding, because the only things we can even come close to considering fact are things we can observe. One can believe that Adam and Eve were the first humans and sculpted out of mud by God, but the only evidence we have of that is a book written by people and translated and reinterpreted and edited by people over the course of well over thousands of years. Does that make it fact? Some say yes; that's their opinion. I think that's a pretty shaky foundation for understanding the way the world works.

Thank you, robosquirrel! If, I misunderstood you before, forgive me. Now I will deal with your response.

What I mean is that there is a limit to human understanding, because the only things we can even come close to considering fact are things we can observe.
I like this. I agree that our understanding is limited; however, observation is not the final arbitrator on fact. How many things are out there that pre-existed us, that was reality without our consent to so. Planetoids, etc, that are a trillions of miles away, yet because we haven't seen it yet, we presume it didn't exist until we saw it. Observations tell me that you, robosquirrel, did not exist until last week when our dialogue began. Now, history on your blogsite may offer information contrary to my assessment, yet I feel you didn't exist because I did not observe said facts until now. With the theories of the ever-expanding universe from the scientific community, I say: Duh! Yet, they posit this information as it were new, yet Biblical texts attest to this very concept long before the 'scientists' did.

Observable data: Everything has a design! Period! We sit here musing over DNA chains and the such; and each shows a unique design and structure not from happenstance but order. Yet, to create/maintain such a variety of differences, you would need an infinitely intelligent creator to have these exist apart from itself. When watches and books are made, they exist apart from the designer/manufacturer but show order and design. So, if on a small scale we can view something so simplistic; why would it be so difficult that someone/something infinite created the ever expanding universe?

In high school, I hated that the math teachers could not come out and state the obvious in the simplest of equations. Any fraction with zero as the denominator was yielded as "undefined". However, in the college level it is yielded as "infinity". The latter being the correct assessment. However, what must be considered in this simple answer? What must be considered in light of the fact that only infinity can produce something from nothing? Big-Bang wrong! Creationism right!

Think about it. Undefined was evolution's answer because it saved face for its pathetic attempt to answer origins which cannot be observed or reproduced in a lab, yet public schools must adhere to this hypothesis that has no substantial evidence to support its tenets. Yet, infinity, which in itself cannot be grasped fully (your point), save by an Infinite Being (my point) offers us much evidence each second. It's not impersonal, not completely transcendent and non-committal; but, loving and willing to interact with His creation. Even there is observable data about the Infinite Creator. All-wise; all-powerful; all-knowing and Eternal because those are encapsulated in Infinity.

So, where do we land in light of an Infinite Being? Smack dab at accountabilities door for us finite beings! Oft times ideologies apart from Judeo/Christian refuse to acknowledge man's fault and desire to stray from the One they know created them. Evolution relegates man to animalistic tendencies rather than being outright depraved! Animalistic behaviour is the product of depravity and absense of morality. It then tries to justify human atrocity and then blurs the line between good and evil. Then, we embrace the devilish ideologies of pragmatism and existentialism which basically says "I don't care what He says, I'll see it out my way regardless!"

You're reference to the unreliability of the Bible will be addressed here. I look forward to further dialogue.

Five perfectly weird things about me

	I am a modest person :D, so filling this out was quite challenging in that I really hate talking about how great I can be.
1.	Like Lone Pony, I daydream. But it is more of a tunnel vision thing when I am programming. Instead of 'excuse me', it's usually 'I'm sorry'.
2.	My son is with me every other weekend, but I have a Sam's Club membership and I buy in bulk.
3.	I love studying all types of languages just for the fun of it (you never know, with the way the libs are trying to destroy this country, it may be helpful to know a couple of languages should we ever be defeated in war. NOT!)
4.	I love studying all the license plates I see, and try to find all possible mathematical computations to make the license plate an equation. (for example: 99N1242; is an equation because 9x9 = 81, 8+1 = 9 and 1+2+4+2 = 9; BTW: 9 is a unique number in that all its multiples add up to 9. So, 9 is the easiest equation to construct; hence make it your last resort if you can't find anything else. I normally have the letters function as equal signs, but hey, it's your license plate and your fun!)
5.	When I build my next home, I want to put a dome observatory on the roof so I can peer out at the stars.

Hence, I curse the following people with this gargantuan task:
1. A Female Soldier's Story 2
1. Let Your Voices Be Heard
3. Liberty Zone
4. Thoughts from the librarian
5. Paul's Other Missionary Journies Yeah! I sent one to myself! My sixth quirk is many identities! HA! LOL!